How to Find Investors: A VC's Playbook for Founders
By Martin Tobias, GP, Incisive Ventures; Founder, InvestorMatch
Martin Tobias is a GP of Incisive Ventures, a pre-seed B2B fund, and the founder of InvestorMatch. A 3x CEO (Loudeye, Tippr, Imperium Renewables) on the Business Insider Seed 100 list, he has invested in startups since 1996.
Published
Category: fundraising
Most founders who can't raise have a list problem, not a pitch problem. How to build a target list by stage, check size and sector, find warm intros, write cold emails investors answer, and track the raise.
Most founders who can't raise don't have a pitch problem. They have a list problem. I've sat on both sides of this table: three times as a CEO (Loudeye went public in 2000), and since 1996 as an investor, now as GP of Incisive Ventures , a pre-seed B2B fund. The founders who close fast pitch fewer investors, and better ones. The stakes are simple. Investors spend less than three minutes on a pitch deck, according to DocSend's research . If that deck lands with a fund that doesn't write your size of check, in your sector, at your stage, those three minutes were spent before they started. This guide is the playbook I give founders: build the list, find the warm paths, write the cold emails that get answered, and track the whole thing like a sales pipeline. Your investor list decides your raise before your pitch does Here's the quiet part: most rejections are arithmetic. A fund with a "$2M minimum" check cannot join a "$750K pre-seed round" no matter how much it likes you. A Series A firm that "also does seed" is underwriting companies two rounds ahead of you. A partner who loves your space just backed your closest competitor. Pre-seed rounds are smaller than most founders assume: 35% of pre-seed rounds on Carta closed under $250,000 in Q4 2025 (Source: Carta, 2026). That means the investors who fit a typical first round are a narrow band: pre-seed funds, micro-VCs, operator angels and seed funds that actually lead early. Big brand names with big funds mostly sit outside it. I call the alternative the spray tax . Every unfit investor on your list costs you a research hour, an email, a follow-up, maybe a meeting, and a "not for us" that teaches you nothing. Founders pay it in months. Cut the list first and the rest of the raise gets easier. Build the target list with four filters, in this order Start with constraints, not names. Write these four down before you open a single database. 1. Stage Match the stage the fund invests at today, not the one on its homepage. Check the last 10 deals. If they are all Series A, the fund is a Series A fund, whatever the website says. Our hubs for pre-seed investors , seed investors and Series A investors are a fast way to see who is active at each stage. 2. Check size Make sure your raise fits inside their check range. If you are raising $1M, a fund that writes $100K checks is a participant and a fund that writes $3M checks is the wrong fund. Check size is also the field most often missing from investor databases. In our own directory of 13,416 published investor profiles, only 7,653 have both a verified website and a known check size (InvestorMatch data, October 2026). Treat any check size you can't confirm as a question for the first call, not a fact. 3. Sector Use the investor's portfolio, not their thesis page, to judge sector fit. "We invest in AI" covers half the internet. Three portfolio companies that look like yours tells you the partner already believes the market is real. Start with the sector hubs for AI investors , SaaS investors , fintech investors and healthcare investors . 4. Geography Decide whether you need local money. Plenty of seed funds invest remotely now, but some still want founders within driving distance, and regional funds often lead rounds the coastal firms will only follow. If location matters, start with the city lists: New York , San Francisco , Boston and Los Angeles . Run all four filters and a list of thousands collapses to a few hundred. Then rank what's left by how many companies like yours each investor has backed. Aim for 50 to 100 names you would be genuinely happy to take money from. Work backwards from companies that look like yours The best signal of what an investor will do next is what they did last. Pick five to ten startups that raised in the last two years at your stage, in your category, with a similar business model. Then find who funded them. Pull the cap tables you can see. Funding announcements, Crunchbase round data and the companies' own press pages name the lead and often the participants. Lead investors matter most, because leads set terms and pull the rest of the round along. Note the partner, not just the firm. A partner decides whether the fund takes your meeting. The partner who led a deal like yours is the one to pitch, and their name is the first line of your email. Check for conflicts. If a fund already owns your direct competitor, cross it off. Most will not back two companies fighting for the same customer, and the ones that will are not the ones you want reading your roadmap. This method is slower than a keyword search. It is also the only one built on behavior instead of marketing copy. One evening of portfolio research beats a week of scrolling a database. Warm intros still win, so build the warm paths yourself Warm introductions convert far better than cold email. Across the Incisive Ventures portfolio, a warm intro gets a founder a meeting about 70% of the time and a cold email about 20 to 30% of the time (Source: Incisive Ventures , 2026). You don't need a famous network to get them. You need to make intros easy. The pattern I push every founder toward is the forwardable list . Don't email your existing investors, advisors and customers asking "do you know any VCs?" That question gets a blank stare. Send them your actual target list, 20 to 30 names with the partner for each, and ask: "Do you know anyone here well enough to send a two-line note?" People remember who they know when they see the names. Mine the portfolio founders. The founders of the companies you found in the last step know your target partners personally. Ask for 15 minutes about their experience raising, not for an intro. Half the time the intro gets offered anyway. Write the intro for them. Give every connector a short paragraph they can paste: what you do, one proof point, why this investor. The less work an intro takes, the more of them happen. Use LinkedIn second-degree connections as a map, not a channel. A mutual connection is a lead to follow up offline. A LinkedIn request to a partner you've never met is a cold email with worse odds. Cold outreach works when it is short and specific Cold email gets a bad name because most of it is bad. Investors do answer inbound pitches that are short, specific and obviously meant for them. They delete the rest. Here is the shape that works. Subject line: the company, the round, one proof point. For example: "Acme: $1.2M pre-seed, 40 paying customers in 5 months". That is an illustration, not a benchmark. Line one: why them. Name the portfolio company or the essay that brought you to this partner. If you can't write this line, the investor shouldn't be on your list. Lines two and three: the problem and what you built. Plain words. No category jargon. Line four: your single best proof point. Revenue, a pilot with a named customer, a waitlist, a technical result. One number beats three adjectives. Line five: the ask. How much you are raising and a request for a 20-minute call. Link the deck; don't attach it. Follow up once, a week later, with something new. A new customer, a hire, a product release. Then stop. Three unanswered nudges read as desperation, and investors talk to each other. Personalization is the whole game here, which is why the list matters so much. If you've done the work above, line one writes itself, because you know exactly why each investor is on the list. Run the raise in tranches and track it like a sales pipeline Don't send 100 emails on the same Monday. Run the raise in tranches of 20 to 30 investors over a focused four-to-six-week window. The first tranche should be good-fit investors who are not your top choices. You'll learn which slides get questions, fix the deck, and arrive at your favorite investors with a sharper pitch and some momentum to talk about. Track every investor in one place. A spreadsheet works. So does a CRM. The columns that matter: investor, partner, warm path or cold, date of first contact, last touch, stage (contacted, meeting, partner meeting, diligence, term sheet, passed), and the reason for any pass. Write down every "no" and the reason. Three passes for the same reason is feedback about your pitch, not about the investors. Fix it before the next tranche. Set a deadline and say it out loud. "We're aiming to close by the end of next month" gives investors a reason to move. Open-ended raises drift. If you want a dedicated tool for this part, our comparison of the best tools to find investors lays out what each one does well and where it falls short, with prices dated and sourced. If you're weighing a specific platform, see our OpenVC alternatives and Metal alternatives pages. Skip the spreadsheet when your time is worth more than the tool Everything above works by hand. It also takes most founders two to three weeks of evenings, and that is time not spent selling. I built InvestorMatch so founders without a VC network get the same targeting I'd do for one of my own portfolio companies, in minutes instead of weeks. Here's how it works. Upload your deck and the AI reads your stage, sector, traction and raise, then returns 20 ranked investor matches with written fit reasoning for each one. Uploading and previewing your matches is free; the full list with contact channels and three drafted outreach emails per investor is $20 one-time per campaign, with no subscription (see pricing ). If you want to pressure-test the deck before it goes out, a deck teardown is $10 one-time (details on the pricing page ). Use it the way you'd use a sharp associate: as the first pass on your list, which you then check against the four filters and your own portfolio research. Then send the list to your connectors and start the first tranche. The founders who raise fastest know exactly which twenty investors to call first. Build your list and start this week. Frequently Asked Questions How do I find investors for my startup with no network? Start with the list, not the network. Filter investors by stage, check size, sector and geography, then work backwards from startups like yours to find the partners who funded them. Those founders become your warm paths. Free investor directories, accelerator demo days and a short, specific cold email cover the rest. How many investors should I contact for a pre-seed or seed round? Build a target list of 50 to 100 well-matched investors, then contact them in tranches of 20 to 30 over four to six weeks. Starting with good-fit investors who aren't your top choices lets you sharpen the pitch before you reach the funds you want most. What is the difference between angel investors and VCs? Angels invest their own money, usually in smaller checks at pre-seed and seed, and decide quickly. Venture capital firms invest a fund raised from limited partners, write larger checks, often lead rounds and set terms. Many first rounds combine a lead fund with several angels. Is cold emailing investors worth it? Yes, if the email is short and specific. Five lines: why this investor, the problem, what you built, your best proof point, and the ask. Investors answer cold emails that are obviously written for them. Generic blasts get deleted, so personalize every message and follow up once.
Tags: finding investors, startup investors, fundraising, pre-seed, seed, warm intros, cold outreach